2010/03/26

[Link Grammar] Abridged summary of link-grammar@googlegroups.com - 14 Messages in 2 Topics

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar/topics

    Richard <richard_5008@yahoo.com> Mar 26 01:06PM -0700 ^
     
    I used MS C++ v6 to compile the original Link41b (pre-ABIWord)
    LinkGammar into various working versions, some which I could link into
    MS Excel or Visual Basic. I didn't have any problems. more...
    Bartosz Browarski <bartosz.browarski@gmail.com> Mar 26 12:28AM +0100 ^
     
    Sorry for spamming, but I just thought of something... I think there is a
    possibility that its an encoding problem. When I run something link-grammar
    related in java, I get:
     
    Warning: The word more...
    Bartosz Browarski <bartosz.browarski@gmail.com> Mar 25 11:38PM +0100 ^
     
    Thanks for your reply. I'm glad its one problem occuring in two places and
    not two different problems ;)
     
    What do you suggest I do about it? The dictionaries are available and
    installed. more...
    Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Mar 25 07:32PM -0600 ^
     
    > This word will be ignored.
     
    > And when I try running link-parser.exe from the command line, I get link-parser.exe:
    > Warning: locale was not UTF-8; force-setting to en_US.UTF-8
    more...
    Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Mar 25 07:37PM -0600 ^
     

    > I mean, that part of the path uses "/" and the other one uses "\"?
    > link-grammar: Info: Dictionary found at
    > C:/msys/1.0/local/share/link-grammar\en\4.0.dict
     
    yes, maybe all those different more...
    Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Mar 25 08:36PM -0600 ^
     

    > Sure, here's what I did (I'm running windows xp 32bit atm):
    > 1. I installed MinGW (default path)
    > 2. I installed minsys (default settings)
     
    I think the core problem here, as I understand it, more...
    Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Mar 25 09:30PM -0600 ^
     
    Hi Boris,
     
    Can you help me with the below? A very quick skim of the main
    google hits for mingw and cygwin very quickly indicates that
    mingw is intended for compiling *windows* programs while more...
    David Hart <hart@singinst.org> Mar 26 02:38PM +1100 ^
     
    Thanks for that insight. I never really understood the distinction
    between them before.
     
    Dave
     
    David Hart | phone +61 419 483 263 | sent from iPhone
     
    more...
    Borislav Iordanov <borislav.iordanov@gmail.com> Mar 26 07:26AM -0400 ^
     
    Hi Linas,
     
    I didn't follow the discussion very carefully and I haven't followed
    the latest link-grammar updates, otherwise I would have tried to help
    more. I used to build with MS VC++. more...
    Murilo Saraiva de Queiroz <muriloq@gmail.com> Mar 26 10:39AM -0300 ^
     
    The problem with Cygwin is the Java bindings. I wasn't able to call a DLL
    generated by Cygwin using JNI (Java Native Interface). See a more detailed
    explanation here:
    more...
    Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Mar 26 08:21AM -0600 ^
     

    > Hi Linas,
     
    > I'll try to find some time this week-end to research this.
     
    OK, thanks, not needed; you've already clarified. FWIW the mingw website is
    explicit
    about what its for: its for more...
    "Simon Stuart" <kraven@greycascade.com> Mar 26 05:31PM ^
     
    Mr Lordanov,
     
    Since you've successfully managed to build the LGP binaries in MSVC++, I don't suppose you could give me a walkthrough on how to get past the annoying "strings.h" issue? Or better yet, more...
    Bartosz Browarski <bartosz.browarski@gmail.com> Mar 26 06:59PM +0100 ^
     
    I'd apprecieate that, as well, because it really was silly of me to just
    group a new .jar and old .dlls together and hope for them to work...
     
    I've tried building the dlls with MSVC++, but I get more...
    Bartosz Browarski <bartosz.browarski@gmail.com> Mar 26 06:55PM +0100 ^
     
    First of all, thanks for all the replies. I'm really starting to understand
    the complexity of whats done here.
     
    I've tried changing the path separator as Linas suggested, but it changed more...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "link-grammar" group.
To post to this group, send email to link-grammar@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to link-grammar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar?hl=en.
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)