2010/04/18

[Link Grammar] Abridged summary of link-grammar@googlegroups.com - 7 Messages in 3 Topics

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar/topics

    arishey <arishey@gmail.com> Apr 17 11:22AM -0700 ^
     
    Welcome to International Workshop on Free/Open Source Software
    Technologies
     
    www.motah.org.sa
     
    --
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "link-grammar" group. more...
    "Rich Elk" <richcooperelk@gmail.com> Apr 16 04:29PM -0700 ^
     
    From the comment below:
     
     
    > with(man, telescope) [0.5]
     
    > with(saw, telescope) [0.5]
     
     
    > you can also use these numbers as rough confidence indicators.
     

     
    How do you extract the relations more...
    "Rich Cooper" <rich@englishlogickernel.com> Apr 16 04:33PM -0700 ^
     
    Sincerely,
     
    Rich Cooper
     
    EnglishLogicKernel.com
     
    Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
     
    9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: link-grammar@googlegroups.com more...
    "Rich Cooper" <rich@englishlogickernel.com> Apr 16 04:49PM -0700 ^
     
    In this case, display_union was changed to 1, but the parse is unaffected
    for "Mike ..":
     

     
     
     

     
     
     

     
    So perhaps there is more to change than just the display_union property? more...
    Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Apr 16 07:06PM -0500 ^
     

    > If you are referring to the "display_union" property, yes, I haven't gotten
    > a driver in place to set it yet, just to look at the settings as in the
    > figures above for that parse.
    more...
    Mike Ross <mikenon@gmail.com> Apr 17 06:18AM -0700 ^
     
    > How do you extract the relations from the parse?  If that involves RelEx, I
    > only have the LGP dll, and not the RelEx inclusion, which isn't available to
    > me immediately.
    more...
    Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Apr 16 06:28PM -0500 ^
     
    Hi,
     
    Version 4.6.7 of link-grammar is now available, containing only a handful
    of minor fixes:
     
    * Fix: configure handling of --enable-hunspell (bugtracker issue 46)
    * Fix: conjoined modifier more...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "link-grammar" group.
To post to this group, send email to link-grammar@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to link-grammar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar?hl=en.

No comments:

Post a Comment