Group: http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar/topics
proai <lchalk@proai.com> Apr 29 04:39PM -0700
^ I origionally ported Link grammar 4.1b to .Net and I finally got a
later (abiword) build to work with my origional code. If any one is
interested, I can make the code available. It requires a
more...
Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Apr 29 06:56PM -0500
^ > tweaking of the released code to make it work (compile). Most
> importantly you must build the projcect as a .lib instead of a .dll
> and link it to my origional port.
You missed a long
more...
proai <lchalk@proai.com> Apr 30 06:25AM -0700
^ I will admit, I did give up for several months and have not attempted
to use abiword version since 4.5.6. The main changes I had to do were
to delete the java project completly (didn't care enough
more...
proai <lchalk@proai.com> Apr 30 08:00AM -0700
^ Just to be clear, I am talking about two different things:
1) A .net wrapper around your 4.6.7 library using Managed C++.
2) a 100% c# version of link grammary, using just your dictionary or
more...
Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Apr 30 10:11AM -0500
^ > Just to be clear, I am talking about two different things:
> 1) A .net wrapper around your 4.6.7 library using Managed C++.
I can redistribute this as part of the standard link-grammar
more...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "link-grammar" group.
To post to this group, send email to link-grammar@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to link-grammar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment