2010/05/07

[Link Grammar] Abridged summary of link-grammar@googlegroups.com - 7 Messages in 1 Topic

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar/topics

    Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> May 05 11:38PM -0500 ^
     
    > database of definitions.  Finally, the best matching definitions (possibly
    > several for common words) would be an indication of what the word is defined
    > to mean, at least to whoever gave more...
    "Rich Cooper" <rich@englishlogickernel.com> May 06 09:18AM -0700 ^
     
    Hi Linas,
     

     
    Comments below;
     
    -Rich
     

     
    Sincerely,
     
    Rich Cooper
     
    EnglishLogicKernel.com
     
    Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
     
    9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2
     

     
    -----Original more...
    Amit Joshi <joshiamitkrishna@gmail.com> May 06 11:48AM +0100 ^
     
    This is one of the complicated reverse lookups - last time I was
    trying to remember a word 'floaters' . The only way I could get it
    was by posting definitions on my own words in a yahoo qna more...
    "Simon Stuart" <kraven@greycascade.com> May 06 10:07PM +0100 ^
     
    Just considering ideas on this subject...
     
     
    Wouldn't it be easier to store a series of "tags" rather than actual descriptions. For example to describe a chair one could have tags such as the more...
    Joel Pitt <joel.pitt@gmail.com> May 07 09:14AM +1200 ^
     
    > way one coud determine the most appropriate probable noun for a description
    > based on whichever noun contains the most matching "tags" (or "keywords" if
    > you preffer).
     
    This is getting close more...
    "Simon Stuart" <kraven@greycascade.com> May 06 10:20PM +0100 ^
     
    Joel,
     
    So OpenCog has relational linkages between the words within its dictionary? Allowing tags from multiple similar (or "related") words to be considered within a given context?
    more...
    Borislav Iordanov <borislav.iordanov@gmail.com> May 06 05:54PM -0400 ^
     
    Yep....I refrained from making the claim that this problem is probably
    AI-complete, but it could be a fun project for OpenCog.
     
    Simon, I believe tagging won't be enough either, even though it will more...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "link-grammar" group.
To post to this group, send email to link-grammar@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to link-grammar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar?hl=en.

No comments:

Post a Comment