2010/07/14

[Link Grammar] Abridged summary of link-grammar@googlegroups.com - 4 Messages in 1 Topic

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar/topics

    Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Jul 13 10:45AM -0500 ^
     
    > Nicely done!  Will there be a Windows DLL of the upgraded version?
     
    Only if someone makes one ...
     
    >Will the
    > old API still hold?
     
    Yes.
     
    The new dictionaries will more-or-less work with more...
    Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Jul 13 10:58AM -0500 ^
     
    > continue to think is the best path forward for link parsing overall
    > (because it gives the option to do semantic parse selection within the
    > parser, not as a post-processing phase)...
    more...
    "Jon D." <jonsafari@yahoo.com> Jul 13 12:48PM -0700 ^
     
    Hi Linas,
    Sorry for the late reply -- this new method of handling conjunctions looks alot like how it is done for PersianLG and ArabicLG (since 2003).  I also was dissatisfied with the previous more...
    Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Jul 13 05:08PM -0500 ^
     

    > I wonder if you've thought about rules for commas yet; as I recall
    > that was an annoying case...
     
    Well, its all annoying ...
     
    I've gotten commas to work, for creating lists of nouns and more...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "link-grammar" group.
To post to this group, send email to link-grammar@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to link-grammar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar?hl=en.

No comments:

Post a Comment