[Link Grammar] Abridged summary of link-grammar@googlegroups.com - 3 Messages in 2 Topics

  Today's Topic Summary

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar/topics

• more doubly-defined idioms [1 Update]
• Query apparent anomalies in en/words/words-medical* [2 Updates]

 Topic: more doubly-defined idioms

Paul McQuesten <mcquesten@gmail.com> Mar 19 12:19AM -0700 ^
 
There are several idioms defined twice in en/4.0.dict, for example
'but_not' at lines 7121 and 7219.
Is the code somehow collecting these as alternatives? If not, which
one prevails, and what are more...

 Topic: Query apparent anomalies in en/words/words-medical*

Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Mar 18 07:06PM -0500 ^
 
> after the numbered questions, along with the corresponding egrep.
 
> 1. None of the words in words-medical.adv.1 and words-medical.prep.1
>   have subscripts. Is this okay?
 
more...

Paul McQuesten <mcquesten@gmail.com> Mar 18 05:29PM -0700 ^
 
> > words-medical.v.4.1:cross_fertilize
 
> Nothing with an underscore can ever have a subscript;
> this is due to a deep technical limitation.
Ah, the mysterious_idiom code!.
 
more...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "link-grammar" group.
To post to this group, send email to link-grammar@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to link-grammar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar?hl=en.