2011/06/18

[Link Grammar] Abridged summary of link-grammar@googlegroups.com - 5 Messages in 2 Topics

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar/topics

    Bruce Williams <williams.bruce@gmail.com> Jun 17 09:18AM -0700 ^
     
    Thanks Linas
     
    Bruce Williams
    Concepts, like individuals, have their histories and are just as  incapable of
    withstanding the ravages of time as are individuals.  But in and
    through all this more...
    Bob Houston <bobh@agents.com> Jun 16 06:09PM -0400 ^
     
    We have a system that uses an old version of the parser (4.1b) and I am interested in migrating to the current version. However, I am seeing a difference in the constituent trees being generated by more...
    Stuti Ajmani <stuti08051@iiitd.ac.in> Jun 17 09:55AM +0530 ^
     
    Any idea on finding the probability of a constituent tree?
    I am planning to use the CFG approach for the same, i.e probability of a
    parse = product of probabilities of all its rules. more...
    Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Jun 17 10:57AM -0500 ^
     
    > Version 4.7.4 constituent tree:    (S (NP The captain) (VP greeted (NP the passengers and the flight attendants)) .)
    > Version 4.1b constituent tree:     (S (NP The captain) (VP greeted (NP (NP more...
    Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Jun 17 11:05AM -0500 ^
     
    > Any idea on finding the probability of a constituent tree?
    > I am planning to use the CFG approach for the same, i.e probability of a
    > parse = product of probabilities of all its rules.
    more...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "link-grammar" group.
To post to this group, send email to link-grammar@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to link-grammar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar?hl=en.

No comments:

Post a Comment