Group: http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar/topics
Ben Goertzel <ben@goertzel.org> Feb 21 11:51PM -0500
^ Not really, the linguistics community doesn't favor C++ for obvious reasons...
--
Ben Goertzel, PhD
CEO, Novamente LLC and Biomind LLC
CTO, Genescient Corp
Chairman, Humanity+
more...
Michael Granger <rubymage@gmail.com> Feb 22 10:20AM -0800
^ On 2/20/11 2:26 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>> the sentence parts, but you lose the POS unless you use the links.
> ? Huh? Maybe the ruby interfaces are doing something funny, dunno;
more...
Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Feb 21 10:25PM -0600
^ ANNOUNCE: RelEx version 1.4.0:
When link-grammar Version 4.7.0 came out, it offered a new, faster way
of dealing with conjunctions, side-stepping many problems associated
with "fat links".
more...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "link-grammar" group.
To post to this group, send email to link-grammar@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to link-grammar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment