Group: http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar/topics
Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Feb 22 08:45PM -0600
^ > I'm new to all this - why would C++ not be favored?
Several reasons:
1) linguists are not programmers.
2) academics seem to think that Java is a great language.
Its certainly taught a lot
more...
Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Feb 22 10:15PM -0600
^ >>> the sentence parts, but you lose the POS unless you use the links.
>> ? Huh? Maybe the ruby interfaces are doing something funny, dunno;
>> the info is available in the C language
more...
"Simon J Stuart" <kraven@greycascade.com> Feb 23 03:54AM
^ <rant>
Ah yes... familiar territory, in that "industry common sense" and "actual
common sense" are worlds apart.
I guess that explains why so many foolish companies are spending (wasting)
more...
Michael Granger <rubymage@gmail.com> Feb 23 10:12AM -0800
^ On 2/22/11 8:15 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>> Structs that are based on link-grammar's 'struct CNode_s'
> FWIW, CNode_s is not really a part of the public API; should use
more...
Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Feb 23 12:31PM -0600
^ > As far as cleanup and uniformity are concerned, I'm still just grateful
> for how nice it is to use now versus the original CMU code.
Ohh, but I do like compliments! however, I'm confused ...
more...
Michael Granger <rubymage@gmail.com> Feb 23 11:11AM -0800
^ On 2/23/11 10:31 AM, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> Ohh, but I do like compliments! however, I'm confused ... the API should
> be very nearly unchanged since then. So what's nicer now (aside from
more...
Meidan <meidan.alon@gmail.com> Feb 23 07:08AM -0800
^ What's the version the parser used in the web demo (
http:// www.link.cs.cmu.edu/link/submit-sentence-4.html)?
I'm getting different results when I run 4.7.3 locally with default
parse options, for
more...
Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com> Feb 23 12:24PM -0600
^ > www.link.cs.cmu.edu/link/submit-sentence-4.html)?
> I'm getting different results when I run 4.7.3 locally with default
> parse options, for some sentence.
Version 4.1b There have been a vast
more...
Ben Goertzel <ben@goertzel.org> Feb 23 01:55PM -0500
^ Linas,
This suggests to me that it might be nice to put up a Web demo with
the current version of the link parser, perhaps giving RelEx results
as well. We used to have such a demo running in
more...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "link-grammar" group.
To post to this group, send email to link-grammar@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to link-grammar+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/link-grammar?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment